Gerrit Scott Dawson Interview: The Ascension of Jesus

A few months ago I read Gerrit Scott Dawson’s book, Jesus Ascended: The Meaning of Christ’s Continuing Incarnation. I was so encouraged and edified by Gerrit’s treatment of Christ’s Ascension (a doctrine that receives little air time in most pulpits and most Christian minds) that I decided to contact Gerrit and interview him about why he devoted 5 years of his life to researching and pondering the Ascension and Continuing Incarnation of Christ. Here’s the interview:

Gerrit, tell us a little bit about yourself. Where do you live? What do you do? What are a few of the books that you’ve written?

After 13 years pastoring in North Carolina, we were called to the First Presbyterian Church in Baton Rouge, Louisiana in 2004.  So, in my first year as pastor, we saw what the church was really made of as Hurricanes Katrina and Rita battered our state.  God’s people were, and are, simply stunning in their compassion.

I’m continually trying to take people deeper into Jesus, into connecting with him in profound and transformative ways.  My latest book is called Discovering Jesus:  Awakening to God. It takes readers through a dozen encounters with Jesus. The whole point is to grow into deeper awareness of our union with Christ.

Jesus Ascended arose out of my passion to explore the riches of Christ, my thirst to know the deep reality of who Jesus is.  I’m not one for visions or voices.  One night, though, when I was awake and didn’t know why, I said, “Speak, Lord, for your servant is listening.”  And the voice sounded inside my head:  “I want you to write about my ascension.”  That moment gave me the perseverance to plow through five years of research and writing.

Gerrit, in your book Jesus Ascended, you say that there’s a major “episode” of the gospel story that’s been sorely neglected by the American church, the episode/doctrine of Jesus’ Ascension. How do you think this happened?

The Ascension of Jesus has always been difficult for us as human beings.   It just seems too fantastic.  Did a guy really rise up in the sky and then disappear?  You can almost visualize a Monty Python cartoon of Jesus waving from the clouds.  We worry that the ascension was about some kind of space travel.  And that seems silly. Now nobody I read from the church fathers to the present actually thought that was the case.  The church has always understood that Jesus did bodily ascend up from the disciples. But he entered the shekinah cloud of glory—he was taken into God’s presence, and thus removed from our sight. He was, in a sense, translated into heaven. He is in a realm to which we cannot travel by any human means. Is your brain scrambled yet? It’s hard to think about the mechanics of the ascension, so we ignore it.

Plus, I think most Christians were like I was—we figure Jesus slipped out of his skin suit just as soon as he could.  He didn’t hang on to our humanity. After his work was done, we figure he got back to being the Son of God without the drag of our human nature. It boggles our minds to consider that he is still in skin, still bearing our humanity.

What are some of the consequences you’ve seen arise from the neglect of this pivotal episode in the gospel story?

The gospel has always created the scandal of particularity. It offends our sense of autonomy and spiritual quest and even American egalitarianism to recognize that in this one particular man, Jesus, the eternal Son of God stood among us.  Thus, God is like Jesus, and not another way. Jesus is Lord of all and I am not lord of my own life anymore.

Now if you want to get away from the claiming, demanding pressure of that truth, you’ve got to get rid of the particularity of Jesus.  You need to spiritualize the resurrection and the ascension.  Let resurrection be about a principle of new life, the continuing influence of Jesus, but not something as scandalous as one dead man who got up.

The ascension takes the scandal even further.  Jesus held onto our humanity. He has taken it into heaven. The future of our humanity is bound up in what he has done with us. Where he goes is where we are meant to go.  What he becomes is what we will become.  All my soul quests, all my spirituality, all my wanting a god on my own terms gets blown away by the God-Man who is in heaven, still in my skin, still insisting that he is the one with whom we all have to deal.

So, we sprititualize the ascension. We make it about how the idea of Jesus got made heavenly.  But that is disastrous for us! Losing the ascension cuts us off from the present work of Christ as our priest and intercessor.  It cuts us off from the power of our hope—that one day our feeble bodies will be like his glorious body.  It cuts us off from the downward pressure of the imminent return of Jesus—the same Jesus who ascended will return as judge and king.  When I forget that, I can lose hope in the future or I can think that my actions have no ultimate consequences, or that what we do in this world or to this earth is not really important.

Gerrit, what are a few practical ways that Christians can apply the doctrine of Jesus’ Ascension and continuing Incarnation to their daily lives?

The Ascension means that Jesus has wedded himself to our humanity forever. That means he has taken what we are into his eternal relationship with his Father.  As we are in Christ, we are included in the Triune love of God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit.  That offers remarkable joy and assurance.

Further, as one ancient father put it, that now “dust sits on the throne of heaven.”  Human being has been taken into the life of God.  Jesus did not drop us.  He holds us in himself.  We have a future.  Who we are will not be lost—we will continue as Jesus does, as embodied creatures, transformed but still continuous with who we are. We will know each other. We will be us, only perfected, into eternity.  That should put a spring in your step and a smile on your face.

More, the continuing incarnation reminds us that Jesus is still going to the Father in our name and on our behalf. He knows what it is to be human, he offers the worship, the obedience, the prayer that we should, but cannot, muster.  As we open ourselves to union with Christ, by the Spirit, he lives his ascended life in us more and more.  That’s where the power for Christian living comes from:  Christ in me, the one who is God and still man, living his resurrected, ascended life through us.

Lastly, it means we can look at this world and realize God is not done with it yet.  He didn’t drop our humanity, he didn’t drop this world. This is why we can go and “waste” time caring for the least and the lost.  This is why we care for creation and seek to restore, not destroy the earth—it is, and remains, the field of God’s redemptive work.

Besides your own great book, are there any other books you’d recommend to those who’d like to study up on Jesus’ Ascension?

I’d recommend going to and ordering a copy of H. B Swete’s The Ascended Christ. It’s 100 years old, but still remarkably clear.  You can get it fairly cheaply and it’s an excellent introduction.  I’d also keep my eye out for the forthcoming Ascension Theology by Douglas Farrow, a popular version of his massive scholarly work.

This Post Has 11 Comments

  1. WOW….gotta read that book and what a perfect time with Easter coming up. Some new thoughts for me just in the interview – thanks!

  2. Still Incarnate

    Milton Stanley from over at Transforming Sermons had a great post up Monday that bounces off a interview of Gerrit Scott Dawson on Christ’s Ascension by Justin Buzzard at Buzzard Blog. As Milton Says – The ascension does matter ….

  3. When Jesus returns all will see him in the clouds. What that means to me is that Jesus will return in spirit. A body can’t float on the clouds. Now, what I came here for is that God, Jesus and the Holy Ghost have made contact recently in 2006. They have a special message for you. It is about the meaning of First is Last and Last is First . The message is this:
    In the morning I go to Heaven. In the afternoon I live my life. In the evening I die, death. What does this mean? In other words this means Birth is Last and Last is Birth. Think of this as a continuous circle of life. Birth, Life, Death, Birth. God also said that Judgment will be before Birth in Heaven. AS birth on Earth is painful so will birth in Heaven. Yes, God has recently made contact and he sent a messenger. Spread this message along, just like a chain letter. OH, one more thing of interest. Did you know that Mike Douglas Died on his Birthday? Mel Steffor

  4. The Roman Catholic Church changed the true story. Jesus is taken to Rome for entertainment with other prisoners. This is what happened to Jesus’ body after he was crucified. Look up Marcus Manlius Capitolinus. The Meaning of Manlius is: Jesus’ body remains in Rome. His body is cast from the Tarpeian Rock after the event is over. This means that his body is discarded yet Jesus is still alive. Then there is something that is even worse that happens, Mary is crushed to death after her son. Mary is crushed and cast from the Tapeian Rock after her son. Jesus gets a new body in Heaven, he does not go to Heaven in his old body. Some one in the Church edited the bible in their own thoughts. I am sorry if this disagrees with what your were taught but this information comes straight from Jesus himself. Mel

  5. Buzz, I read parts of the Bible, not all. Jesus sent me to two books. Daniel and Revelation. The verse on First is Last was on page 1, first column of Revelation. I saw it there. Some one removed it from the bible. Then just about everything that God told me is in direct contradiction with the bible. Who should I believe, The Bible or God? Thanks Mel

  6. Correction: To the meaning of First is Last and Last is First. It means that Birth is Last and Birth is First. Sorry for the error. God talks in symbols and opposites at times, so it takes time to figure out what he is saying. Some of his messages are clearer than others, plus they have multiple meanings.

  7. I don’t think people understand the message about Birth is Last and Birth is First. To clear up any misunderstanding I would like to explain what this means. God is saying that Birth is Last (First is Last). The next part of the message is: Last is First. Since we now know that Birth is Last (Birth=Last), subsitute birth for last making the second part of the message, birth is first. Or last is now first.
    I know this seems jumbled. Think of it in another way. Birth is Last in this part of your developement. After you are born in the next stage of development it becomes the first.
    Another way of understanding this is to think of a fetus. A fetus exists but has not been born yet (unborn). The last stage of a fetus is Birth (Birth is Last). After a fetus is born it now becomes the beginning or First, (Birth is First).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *